LLM evaluation

LLM evaluation is the practice of measuring whether a large language model’s outputs meet defined standards for accuracy, grounding, tone, safety, and policy compliance. This happens before launch and on an ongoing basis after. Among core AI operations terms, it covers four main approaches: offline scoring against held-out cases (see evaluation set), human review, model-as-judge scoring, and live production monitoring. Teams also run regression testing after any prompt or model change, to confirm quality holds steady. Example: re-running a fixed set of refund questions after a prompt update, to check that no new ungrounded answers appear. OnClarity’s AI safety guardrails and AI agents, which ground responses in approved knowledge sources, support this kind of ongoing evaluation in production.

LLM evaluation is the practice of measuring whether a large language model’s outputs meet defined standards for accuracy, grounding, tone, safety, and policy compliance. This happens before launch and on an ongoing basis after. Among core AI operations terms, it covers four main approaches: offline scoring against held-out cases (see evaluation set), human review, model-as-judge scoring, and live production monitoring. Teams also run regression testing after any prompt or model change, to confirm quality holds steady. Example: re-running a fixed set of refund questions after a prompt update, to check that no new ungrounded answers appear. OnClarity’s AI safety guardrails and AI agents, which ground responses in approved knowledge sources, support this kind of ongoing evaluation in production.

Support teams are no longer a cost centre.

See how AI Support Agent, Agent Assist, and VoC Analyst work on your own ticket volume.