AI Return Model byOnClarity

What happens when support fixes things the first time.

The OnClarity AI Return Model follows seven personas through 48 simulated months of a contact centre, hour by hour. Every number is modelled, sourced and stress-tested.

15%of issues are never resolved today

In the reference contact centre, after the switch.

Issues never resolved
15%→5%
after every repeat and give-up
CSAT
65%→73%
top-box
Agent attrition
40%→29%
a year
Customer growth
+8%→+13%
customers in 3 years, with support cost down 5%
Reference organisation: 1 million customers, 200,000 issues a month. Model output, steady state.

Seven personas, one queue.

Everyone in a contact centre shares the same queue. Change what goes into it and all seven personas change.

Pain todayWaits hours for a four-minute answer
What changesThe AI resolves it and checks it stayed fixed
Time to resolution 7.1 hours to 46 minutes, on average

Contained is not resolved.

A generic AI that is paid per contained conversation counts give-ups as wins. They come back as new contacts. OnClarity counts an issue as resolved only when it doesn’t come back.

Generic AIOnClarity
Claimed contained80%79%
Verified resolved66%78%
Issues never resolved16.0%, worse than today’s 15.1%5.2%
Agent attrition53%29%
Generic AI: an illustrative containment-billed agent with a weaker handoff.

One decision changes the answer for agents.

The AI frees capacity. How you staff the team after go-live decides how much of it reaches agents and waiting customers. Between 65% and 80% planned occupancy, every persona wins.

75% planned occupancy
65%70%75%80%
Agent attrition29%today 40%
Abandoned contacts1.4%today 4.8%
Monthly support cost$331ktoday $373k
Before and after go-live, at 75%
Agent attrition a year
40%→29%
-28%
OnClarity goes live
TodayMonth 0Month 12Month 24
TodayWithout OnClarityWith OnClarity

How the model works.

Eight connected layers, run month by month for four years, with an hourly queue inside every month.

Issues inValue out01Demand02Routing andresolution03Queue04Workforce05Quality06VoC action07Customeroutcomes08Economicsevery hourBurnout spiralRepeat spiralFix loopRetention loop
Evidence behind the inputs

30 inputs: 11 from peer-reviewed or analyst research, 10 client or OnClarity inputs a pilot replaces, 9 ranged assumptions.

11 research10 client or OnClarity9 ranged assumptions
Stress test

100 simulations with 22 inputs varied at once. With balanced staffing, all seven personas are better off in every one.

$0$8M$16M

3-year value in the reference organisation: $5.4M to $13.8M (10th to 90th percentile). Reference run $12.8M, marked in white.

Sources
  • Brynjolfsson, Li and Raymond (QJE 2025)
  • Brown et al. (JASA 2005)
  • Gartner (2019, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026)
  • SQM Group
  • McKinsey
  • Forrester
  • Bakker, Demerouti and Schaufeli (2003)
  • Keiningham et al. (2007)

Run it on your contact centre.

Four numbers. About twenty seconds. A report and a PDF your team can check line by line.

Uses about 12 defaults. Every one is listed in your report.

Questions a CFO will ask.

It simulates the operation month by month: queues, repeats, attrition, hiring, churn. Cost and value come out of that simulation instead of being assumed.

AI Return Model

All figures on this page come from the OnClarity AI Return Model run on a reference organisation of 1 million customers and 200,000 issues a month, at steady state. They are model outputs, not forecasts or guarantees. Third-party statistics are cited with their sources.