Deployment & Data Sovereignty

Deploy AI you’re actually allowed to deploy.

Clarity runs on-premise, inside your border, on your hardware, with the documentation your regulator, your board and your own security team will accept.

Your infrastructure

Your models

Your data, never ours

A paper trail that survives review

When the regulator decides.
Not the budget.

Grouped by mandate, not geography, because the mandate is what the deal turns on. Anonymised.

Capital markets & central banks

A financial services firm is replacing its incumbent platform outright because the regulator requires data to sit in-country. A central bank rejects any solution where data leaves the country, even anonymised.

Banking supervision

PDPL and SAMA documentation gates the deal before commercials are discussed. The security review is the sales cycle.

Government & data classification

Tier-one classified data, with hosting gated on national AI-authority compliance before any pilot can begin.

Group data governance

“Data is very sensitive and cannot be shared with any AI.” “One mistake costs a lot of money.” The objection is rarely technical.

Clear rules, strict guardrails.
Human oversight.

Reference Architecture

The same topology everywhere.

Component view, identical across SaaS, in-region cloud and fully on-premise. The components don’t change between deployment modes. Only where the boundary sits.

Your datacenter
Channels & systems of record
Voice & IVR
recordings, transcripts
Chat, email, social
WhatsApp, web, review sources
CRM & core systems
tickets, accounts, entitlements
Orchestration
AI Agent Hub
ModelsTools / MCPConfidence gates
Ingestion & enrichment
PII removal → classification, sentiment, embeddings, before anything is stored
Observability & audit
logs, metrics, traces, and a 100% QA audit trail, end to end
Intelligence
LLM serving
Open models on your own GPUs. Cloud providers not required.
Retrieval & knowledge
grounded answers, conflict detection
Scoring & QA engine
every conversation, one rubric
Memory & data
Vector store
embeddings, per-tenant namespaces
Object storage & backup
encrypted at rest, your hardware
Warehouse & analytics
reporting, exports, retention policy
Fully on-prem with GPU inference: data stays in-country, encrypted in transit and at rest, model- and cloud-agnostic.

Same topology everywhere. The components don’t change between SaaS and on-premise, only where the boundary sits.

Model & Data Control

Your models. Or ours. Your call.

GPU inference in-house on open-weight models, a cloud provider, or your own endpoint. The orchestration layer doesn’t care which you choose, and neither does your architecture.

Open-weight models, in-house GPU

Your own hosted endpoint

In-region managed endpoints

No third-party model dependency required

AI Agent Hub

Models

open-weight, in-house GPU

Tools

MCP and function calling

Gates

confidence threshold, handover

Retrieval

Vector store

Storage

Audit

Topology unchanged

PII is removed before anything is stored.

Not masked in the UI. Not redacted on export. Removed at ingestion, before classification, before embedding, before it touches a database.

Inbound

Hi, this is Dana Al-Rashid, ID ID-4471-0392, phone +00 555 0142. My card hasn’t arrived.

Ingestion

Hi, this is ██████ ⟨name⟩, ID ██████ ⟨national-id⟩, phone ██████ ⟨phone⟩. My card hasn’t arrived.

classified

sentiment

embedded

Boundary

Storage

Hi, this is ██████, ID ██████, phone ██████. My card hasn’t arrived.

Raw PII never crosses.

Synthetic example. Removal happens at ingestion, so the unmasked text has no path to a database.

A paper trail that survives review.

Every AI and human action logged, timestamped and exportable, in the format a reviewer asks for.

Audit trail

09:14:02

system

Conversation ingested, PII removed

#a91f

09:14:03

AI

Intent classified: card delivery

#b7c4

09:14:06

AI

Answer grounded in KB article 4471

#c02e

09:15:41

agent

Response approved and sent

#d55a

09:16:10

AI

Conversation scored against rubric

#e18b

09:16:11

system

Trail sealed and exported

#f3d0

Exportable, timestamped, immutable

Compliance matrix

What your reviewer will ask for

SOC 2

AES-256 at rest

GDPR & HIPAA ready

TLS 1.2+ in transit

PDPL aligned

Role-based access

NIST and ISO/IEC 42001 alignment

Full audit logs

99.9% uptime SLA

DR plans tested

Cyber insurance

Published subprocessors

How a deployment actually runs.

Four phases, and an honest statement of where the time really goes.

Phase 01

Scoping

We do: architecture review, data-flow mapping, prerequisite form.

You provide: classification policy and security contacts.

Phase 02

Provisioning

We do: deployment manifests, model serving, hardening guide.

You provide: hardware or tenancy, GPU capacity, network access.

Phase 03

Integration

We do: channel and CRM connectors, ingestion, PII rules.

You provide: service accounts and access approvals.

Phase 04

Validation

We do: audit-trail walkthrough, DR test, sign-off pack.

You provide: reviewer time and acceptance criteria.

Deployed, not roadmapped.

Scoped and priced on-premise deployments exist today, in regulated financial services. We’ll walk your team through one under NDA.

The questions your security team will ask.

Is on-premise the same product as your SaaS?

Yes. Same components, same orchestration, same audit trail, the deployment boundary moves, the topology does not. That is the point of the reference architecture: an architect who sees the diagram restructure between modes should conclude they are being sold a different, less-tested product.

Can we run without any third-party model provider?

What exactly leaves our network?

Where is PII removed?

What standards do you hold or align to?

What does the audit trail actually contain?

What hardware do we need to provision?

How long does a deployment take?

What happens if we want to leave?

Clarity

The question was never whether the AI is good.

It was whether you’re allowed to run it. And whether the answer holds up when someone asks you to prove it.

Talk to our experts