OpenEvidence
This is customized report built by Clarity, using AI to analyze feedback from platforms like the App Store and Reddit.
Building trust in every customer interaction
Access Limitations
The app's requirement for an NPI number excludes many healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists and veterinarians, from using the platform. This affects around 10% of potential users.
As a veterinarian, I can't access the app because I don't have an NPI number.
Server Overload
Users experience frequent server crashes and high demand errors, limiting their ability to use the app effectively. This issue impacts about 8% of users.
The app crashes after a few queries due to high traffic, making it hard to use.
Lack of Article Library
The absence of a feature to save and organize articles for future reference is a significant inconvenience for users. Approximately 5% of users have expressed this concern.
It's cumbersome to find previously read articles without a saved articles library feature.
Users' choice
OpenEvidence receives high praise for its accuracy, ease of use, and comprehensive evidence-based resources. Users appreciate its ability to provide quick, well-referenced answers, although some express frustration with registration issues and the requirement for an NPI number.
Runner up
DynaMed is lauded for its concise, evidence-based information and user-friendly interface. Users find it more organized and up-to-date than some competitors, though some experience technical issues with app stability and updates.
Straggler
Epocrates is valued for its streamlined information and ease of use, particularly for drug interactions and quick references. However, recent changes requiring subscriptions for previously free content have disappointed long-time users.
NPI Requirement
The app's strict NPI requirement for registration excludes many healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists and veterinarians, who lack an NPI but are still qualified users. This limitation is seen as a significant barrier to access for a broader range of medical professionals.
Registration Issues
Users experience technical difficulties during the registration process, where inputting valid NPI numbers results in errors or the fields resetting, preventing successful account creation. This issue frustrates potential users who are unable to access the app despite meeting the requirements.
Server Overload
The app frequently crashes or becomes unresponsive due to high demand, limiting users to only a few queries before encountering server errors. This instability undermines the app's reliability and usability during critical moments.
Access Limitations
The app's current access model restricts international healthcare professionals who lack a U.S. NPI, despite their qualifications and need for the service. This exclusionary policy limits the app's global reach and potential user base.
Content Storage
The app lacks a feature for saving and organizing articles or responses for future reference, making it cumbersome for users to revisit previously accessed information. A library feature with note-taking capabilities would enhance user experience and efficiency.
CME Claiming
Users can only claim Continuing Medical Education (CME) credits through the website, not the app, which is inconvenient for those who primarily use the mobile platform. Integrating CME claiming into the app would streamline the process and improve user satisfaction.
Bring all your feedback into one place—so product, support, customer experience and leadership work from the same source of truth.
