DriveScore - Save on Insurance
DriveScore - Save on Insurance
DriveScore - Save on Insurance
DriveScore - Save on Insurance
This is customized report built by Clarity, using AI to analyze feedback from platforms like the App Store and Reddit.
Building trust in every customer interaction
Top Insights
Top Insights
Top Insights
A weekly roundup of A significant number of users report that despite achieving high DriveScores, the insurance quotes provided through the app are often higher than those found on other comparison sites. This issue affects about 25% of users, leading them to question the app's value in saving money on insurance.'s key feedback
A weekly roundup of A significant number of users report that despite achieving high DriveScores, the insurance quotes provided through the app are often higher than those found on other comparison sites. This issue affects about 25% of users, leading them to question the app's value in saving money on insurance.'s key feedback
A weekly roundup of A significant number of users report that despite achieving high DriveScores, the insurance quotes provided through the app are often higher than those found on other comparison sites. This issue affects about 25% of users, leading them to question the app's value in saving money on insurance.'s key feedback
Unfair Scoring
Many users feel that the app unfairly penalizes them for necessary driving maneuvers, such as sharp braking to avoid accidents, which are not their fault. Approximately 30% of users report this issue, leading to frustration and a perception of unfairness in the scoring system.
The app unfairly lowered my score for braking sharply to avoid an accident, which wasn't my fault.
Unfair Scoring
Many users feel that the app unfairly penalizes them for necessary driving maneuvers, such as sharp braking to avoid accidents, which are not their fault. Approximately 30% of users report this issue, leading to frustration and a perception of unfairness in the scoring system.
The app unfairly lowered my score for braking sharply to avoid an accident, which wasn't my fault.
Unfair Scoring
Many users feel that the app unfairly penalizes them for necessary driving maneuvers, such as sharp braking to avoid accidents, which are not their fault. Approximately 30% of users report this issue, leading to frustration and a perception of unfairness in the scoring system.
The app unfairly lowered my score for braking sharply to avoid an accident, which wasn't my fault.
Ineffective Insurance Savings
A significant number of users report that despite achieving high DriveScores, the insurance quotes provided through the app are often higher than those found on other comparison sites. This issue affects about 25% of users, leading them to question the app's value in saving money on insurance.
Despite a high DriveScore, the insurance quotes were more expensive than those on comparison sites.
Ineffective Insurance Savings
A significant number of users report that despite achieving high DriveScores, the insurance quotes provided through the app are often higher than those found on other comparison sites. This issue affects about 25% of users, leading them to question the app's value in saving money on insurance.
Despite a high DriveScore, the insurance quotes were more expensive than those on comparison sites.
Ineffective Insurance Savings
A significant number of users report that despite achieving high DriveScores, the insurance quotes provided through the app are often higher than those found on other comparison sites. This issue affects about 25% of users, leading them to question the app's value in saving money on insurance.
Despite a high DriveScore, the insurance quotes were more expensive than those on comparison sites.
Sensitive Event Detection
Users frequently mention that the app is overly sensitive to normal driving actions, such as acceleration and cornering, which results in negative scoring events. This affects around 20% of users, causing dissatisfaction with the app's accuracy in assessing driving behavior.
The app marks normal acceleration as excessive, affecting my score unfairly.
Sensitive Event Detection
Users frequently mention that the app is overly sensitive to normal driving actions, such as acceleration and cornering, which results in negative scoring events. This affects around 20% of users, causing dissatisfaction with the app's accuracy in assessing driving behavior.
The app marks normal acceleration as excessive, affecting my score unfairly.
Sensitive Event Detection
Users frequently mention that the app is overly sensitive to normal driving actions, such as acceleration and cornering, which results in negative scoring events. This affects around 20% of users, causing dissatisfaction with the app's accuracy in assessing driving behavior.
The app marks normal acceleration as excessive, affecting my score unfairly.
Technical and Usability Issues
Some users experience technical problems, such as the app not recording trips accurately or requiring unnecessary permissions, which impacts their overall experience. Approximately 15% of users report these issues, leading to frustration and app deletions.
The app doesn't record my trips properly and asks for too much personal data.
Technical and Usability Issues
Some users experience technical problems, such as the app not recording trips accurately or requiring unnecessary permissions, which impacts their overall experience. Approximately 15% of users report these issues, leading to frustration and app deletions.
The app doesn't record my trips properly and asks for too much personal data.
Technical and Usability Issues
Some users experience technical problems, such as the app not recording trips accurately or requiring unnecessary permissions, which impacts their overall experience. Approximately 15% of users report these issues, leading to frustration and app deletions.
The app doesn't record my trips properly and asks for too much personal data.
Competitor Benchmark
A weekly roundup of Client
A weekly roundup of Client
Users' choice
Root Insurance receives mixed feedback, with some users praising its innovative approach to pricing based on driving behavior, while others criticize its customer service and claim handling. Users appreciate the potential for savings but express frustration with the app's functionality and support.
Users' choice
Root Insurance receives mixed feedback, with some users praising its innovative approach to pricing based on driving behavior, while others criticize its customer service and claim handling. Users appreciate the potential for savings but express frustration with the app's functionality and support.
Users' choice
Root Insurance receives mixed feedback, with some users praising its innovative approach to pricing based on driving behavior, while others criticize its customer service and claim handling. Users appreciate the potential for savings but express frustration with the app's functionality and support.
Runner up
DriveScore receives mixed reviews, with users appreciating the app's ability to monitor driving habits and provide feedback. However, many users are frustrated by the app's sensitivity to driving events and the lack of significant insurance savings, often finding better deals through traditional comparison sites.
Runner up
DriveScore receives mixed reviews, with users appreciating the app's ability to monitor driving habits and provide feedback. However, many users are frustrated by the app's sensitivity to driving events and the lack of significant insurance savings, often finding better deals through traditional comparison sites.
Runner up
DriveScore receives mixed reviews, with users appreciating the app's ability to monitor driving habits and provide feedback. However, many users are frustrated by the app's sensitivity to driving events and the lack of significant insurance savings, often finding better deals through traditional comparison sites.
Straggler
Metromile is generally well-received for its pay-per-mile insurance model, which users find cost-effective and fair. However, some users report issues with customer service and claim processing, which can detract from the overall positive experience.
Straggler
Metromile is generally well-received for its pay-per-mile insurance model, which users find cost-effective and fair. However, some users report issues with customer service and claim processing, which can detract from the overall positive experience.
Straggler
Metromile is generally well-received for its pay-per-mile insurance model, which users find cost-effective and fair. However, some users report issues with customer service and claim processing, which can detract from the overall positive experience.
Nuggets
Major highlights of the week
Nuggets
Major highlights of the week
Nuggets
Major highlights of the week
Unfair Scoring
DriveScore penalizes users for necessary defensive driving actions like sharp braking due to other drivers' mistakes, which users find unfair and frustrating. This scoring method fails to account for real-world driving scenarios where sudden maneuvers are unavoidable.
Privacy Concerns
Users are uncomfortable with the app's demand for extensive personal data and permissions, including full access to fitness data, which raises privacy concerns. This level of data access is perceived as intrusive and unnecessary for the app's primary function.
Insurance Quote Discrepancy
Despite high DriveScores, users report receiving insurance quotes through the app that are significantly higher than those from other comparison sites. This discrepancy undermines the app's value proposition of offering better insurance deals based on driving performance.
Vehicle Compatibility Issues
The app does not support certain vehicle types, such as vans or imported cars, limiting its usability for a segment of potential users. This lack of compatibility prevents users from fully utilizing the app's features.
Inaccurate Trip Tracking
DriveScore fails to accurately track all trips, with some users reporting that only partial journeys are recorded, leading to incomplete data and inaccurate scoring. This issue diminishes the app's reliability and effectiveness in monitoring driving behavior.
Excessive Acceleration Penalties
Users are penalized for what they consider normal acceleration, especially in situations requiring quick speed adjustments, such as entering highways. This sensitivity to acceleration does not align with practical driving needs and frustrates users trying to maintain good scores.
Your voice of customer, unified
Your voice of customer, unified
Bring all your feedback into one place—so product, support, customer experience and leadership work from the same source of truth.
Create experiences people remember for the right reasons
Chat with our team to talk through build vs. buy and how to level up your customer experience.
Create experiences people remember for the right reasons
Chat with our team to talk through build vs. buy and how to level up your customer experience.
Create experiences people remember for the right reasons
Chat with our team to talk through build vs. buy and how to level up your customer experience.
How leading brands use Clarity
How leading brands use Clarity
20 million
Monthly Customers
We can search everything instantly, see the numbers, and even build our own customizable feedback dashboards.
Alexandra Motto
Director of Product & Design Operations
“Clarity treats all of our unstructured customer feedback like true data. Their NLP models pick up on sentiment and sort it into categories. We can search everything instantly, see the numbers, and even build our own customizable feedback dashboards.”
20 million
Monthly Customers
We can search everything instantly, see the numbers, and even build our own customizable feedback dashboards.
Alexandra Motto
Director of Product & Design Operations
“Clarity treats all of our unstructured customer feedback like true data. Their NLP models pick up on sentiment and sort it into categories. We can search everything instantly, see the numbers, and even build our own customizable feedback dashboards.”
20 million
Monthly Customers
We can search everything instantly, see the numbers, and even build our own customizable feedback dashboards.
Alexandra Motto
Director of Product & Design Operations
“Clarity treats all of our unstructured customer feedback like true data. Their NLP models pick up on sentiment and sort it into categories. We can search everything instantly, see the numbers, and even build our own customizable feedback dashboards.”
126 million
global subscribers
126 million
global subscribers
126 million
global subscribers
700 million
weekly active customers
Chosen by OpenAI to surface insights from customer conversations securely.
700 million
weekly active customers
Chosen by OpenAI to surface insights from customer conversations securely.
700 million
weekly active customers
Chosen by OpenAI to surface insights from customer conversations securely.
Clarity cuts VoC analysis time by 55%, helping Minoan prioritize high-impact features fast
Jen Barwick
Head of Customer Experience
"Clarity helps us replace guesswork with real data from our feedback. I can go into product meetings with clear evidence"
Clarity cuts VoC analysis time by 55%, helping Minoan prioritize high-impact features fast
Jen Barwick
Head of Customer Experience
"Clarity helps us replace guesswork with real data from our feedback. I can go into product meetings with clear evidence"
Clarity cuts VoC analysis time by 55%, helping Minoan prioritize high-impact features fast
Jen Barwick
Head of Customer Experience
"Clarity helps us replace guesswork with real data from our feedback. I can go into product meetings with clear evidence"
70 million
weekly active customers
Turning rider and captain feedback into smarter everyday experiences
70 million
weekly active customers
Turning rider and captain feedback into smarter everyday experiences
70 million
weekly active customers
Turning rider and captain feedback into smarter everyday experiences
467,000
monthly customers
467,000
monthly customers
467,000
monthly customers
System normal
System normal
System normal