Deepsearch AI Search Assistant
This is customized report built by Clarity, using AI to analyze feedback from platforms like the App Store and Reddit.
Building trust in every customer interaction
Inaccurate Search Results
Users frequently report that the app provides inaccurate or irrelevant search results, often mixing up information from different individuals. This issue affects about 20% of users, who find the app unreliable for its intended purpose.
The app doesn't work; it mixes information from multiple people, making it a waste of money.
Limited Functionality
A significant number of users find the app's functionality limited, as it often only retrieves basic information available through free services like Google. Around 25% of users feel the app doesn't offer unique value.
Everything you can do in this app you can do in Google or on socials for free.
Mandatory Payment
Users are frustrated by the requirement to pay before accessing any meaningful features, with no opportunity to test the app's effectiveness first. This issue is highlighted by about 10% of users.
You have to immediately pay before even seeing proof that this app works.
Users' choice
Perplexity is highly praised for its accuracy, speed, and ability to provide detailed and correct answers quickly. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and the ability to switch between different AI models, making it a preferred choice over traditional search engines.
Runner up
Deepsearch AI Search Assistant receives mixed feedback, with some users finding it helpful for reconnecting with friends and discovering social profiles, while others criticize it for providing inaccurate information and being no better than a basic Google search. The app's subscription model and lack of a true free trial are also points of contention.
Straggler
eHarmony is criticized for its high costs, lack of genuine matches, and poor customer service. Users report issues with fake profiles, difficulty in canceling subscriptions, and a lack of features without paying for premium services, leading to a generally negative perception.
Deceptive Free Trial
The app's 'free trial' is misleading as users are charged upfront, which is perceived as a deceptive practice that undermines trust. This approach fails to provide a genuine trial experience, deterring potential customers from engaging with the app.
Inaccurate Results
The app frequently provides inaccurate or irrelevant search results, failing to deliver on its promise of precise social media and background information. Users report that searches often yield mixed or incorrect data, diminishing the app's reliability.
Google Comparison
Many users find the app's functionality comparable to a basic Google search, questioning the value of paying for a service that offers no distinct advantage. This perception reduces the app's perceived value and competitive edge.
Mandatory Payment
The requirement to pay before accessing any meaningful features frustrates users, as they cannot evaluate the app's effectiveness without financial commitment. This paywall limits user engagement and satisfaction.
Refund Issues
Users express dissatisfaction with the app's refund policy, reporting difficulties in obtaining refunds after unsatisfactory experiences. This lack of customer support exacerbates negative perceptions and user frustration.
Fake Reviews
There is a perception that many positive reviews are fabricated, leading to skepticism about the app's credibility and effectiveness. This suspicion undermines trust and deters potential users from downloading the app.
Bring all your feedback into one place—so product, support, customer experience and leadership work from the same source of truth.
